Court AI Rules

Indiana

Ind. Trial Rule 11 (amended), new T.R. 11.1 and 11.2, Order Amending Rules of Trial Procedure, No. 26S-MS-8

Verification required

Effective August 1, 2026 · Verified October 14, 2026.

Information about court rules, not legal advice. Rules change; read the order itself before you file.

An attorney's signature (or a self-represented party's under T.R. 11.1) certifies, among other things, that any cited legal authority is authentic, expressly including filings prepared with AI assistance; citing fictitious authority can support an abusive-litigant finding under T.R. 11.2.

“This rule applies to all pleadings, motions, and other submissions to the court by parties represented by attorney, including without limitation those prepared with the assistance of artificial intelligence, the internet, or other resources.”

Source →

The quoted text is T.R. 11(F). The certification "that any cited legal authority is authentic" appears in T.R. 11(B) and 11.1(C). This is a certification of authenticity, not an AI-disclosure requirement. The Indiana Supreme Court separately issued AI guidance for trial judges in February 2026.

Individual courts or judges in Indiana may have their own orders.

Rules change, and individual judges and courts may have their own orders. Check the court's site and your judge's standing orders before you file.

Report a changeTerms

Verify before you file. Start with one citation.

HallucinX checks that each cited case exists and that quoted text appears in the opinion. The duty to verify stays with you; this makes it faster.